<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virtual Theology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://viridia.org/2007/05/20/virtual-theology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://viridia.org/2007/05/20/virtual-theology/</link>
	<description>Imaginative Projects and Interesting Ideas</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Iridium</title>
		<link>http://viridia.org/2007/05/20/virtual-theology/#comment-6615</link>
		<dc:creator>Iridium</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 03:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://viridia.org/2007/05/20/virtual-theology/#comment-6615</guid>
		<description>Hum...

Your counter-arguments are intriguing to say the very least.  The lower resolution argument is something that parallels a long standing discussion I've have going with a good friend.  One in which me toss about theories regarding the actually physical construct of the universe.  I shall definitely bring your counter-argument to the table if you don't mind.  As far as the second of your fine counter-arguments I have to say without a more in depth understanding of the universe beyond the three dimensions we can substantiate I think that possibility is in a future far far away.  Yes!  I did say three dimensions.   As in my personal opinion time is not a universal constant, due to it's highly subjective malleability. I tend to shun the concept of time as the fourth dimension.  In deference to your third counter-argument I must say this seems to me to be the argument with the highest degree of probability.  Once we can make the leap beyond the third dimension barrier we seem to be so fettered with I think we will discover a great many others are already using that space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hum&#8230;</p>
<p>Your counter-arguments are intriguing to say the very least.  The lower resolution argument is something that parallels a long standing discussion I&#8217;ve have going with a good friend.  One in which me toss about theories regarding the actually physical construct of the universe.  I shall definitely bring your counter-argument to the table if you don&#8217;t mind.  As far as the second of your fine counter-arguments I have to say without a more in depth understanding of the universe beyond the three dimensions we can substantiate I think that possibility is in a future far far away.  Yes!  I did say three dimensions.   As in my personal opinion time is not a universal constant, due to it&#8217;s highly subjective malleability. I tend to shun the concept of time as the fourth dimension.  In deference to your third counter-argument I must say this seems to me to be the argument with the highest degree of probability.  Once we can make the leap beyond the third dimension barrier we seem to be so fettered with I think we will discover a great many others are already using that space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
